Engius intelliRock Concrete Maturity Blog

Mass Pours - Mass Material Cost Savings

clock September 13, 2010 23:10 by author Michael Fox
mass pour

As concrete maturity technology gains popularity, users are continuing to leverage its benefits. Today's application trend offers substantial cost saving opportunities on mass concrete pours.  And if you could shave 10%, or even 20%, off of your concrete material cost before bidding, wouldn't that offer you a substantial competitive advantage?

Temperature management is a key risk-management task on mass concrete pours. Usually, maximum temperatures need to be kept below ~160F to avoid DEF issues and thermal gradients must be kept below some threshold value, such as 35F, to minimize the thermal cracking. These requirements are often viewed as challenges, BUT the root cause of these thermal control "problems" can also be viewed as a tremendous opportunity. Since cement hydration generates heat, and that heat gets trapped in mass pours (which is what causes the temperature rise), it takes a lot less cement to get the job done. And less cement means lower temperatures and substantial reductions in material cost! Even if cement content is reduced in the mix-design, the trapped heat will continue to drive the hydration reactions and strength gain. So this really creates a win-win opportunity to both reduce concrete temperatures and material costs at the same time.

To "tune" your mix design, use intelliRock concrete maturity sensors in your pre-pour test blocks. By instrumenting blocks made with multiple mix designs, and simultaneously calibrating the maturity values using cylinder breaks, intelliRock maturity sensors can determine the anticipated temperature rises AND strength gain profiles. Once you have real data defining the temperatures and strengths for each mix design, you can make some cost-saving decisions by using lower-cost mix designs!

For more information see the blog post below. And remember that these opportunities are compounded by the retained heat in mass concrete placements!
http://www.engius.com/blog/post/Using-intelliRock-to-Lower-Material-Costs.aspx


Cylinders - What if they're wrong?

clock May 12, 2010 23:53 by author Michael Fox

Standard cured cylinders are good indicators of POTENTIAL strength, but are cylinders good tools for determining in-place strength?

Is it safe to strip forms? Are the piers strong enough to be loaded? Are you sure?

There's a lot riding on break results. But their accuracy may surprise you.  Read More!


Concrete Maturity used for Shotcrete? You bet!

clock March 31, 2010 23:12 by author Michael Fox

Contractors in Colorado have been using intelliRock concrete maturity loggers in shotcrete for several years. In one instance in 2008, winter arrived and the contractor was concerned about construction speed and heating costs. The contractor developed a maturity calibration curve then place intelliRock maturity loggers along the retaining wall being built. Once the concrete was placed the wall was covered and the heaters were turned on.

In general, a typical Colorado winter spec requires the contractor to maintain the placement above 50 F for 7 days or until there's proof that the placement has achieved 75% of the required concrete strength. In this case, the contractor used intelliRock to determine that the placement achieved 75% strength well in advance of the turn-time on previous walls - and during this one it was snowing! The savings on the heating costs alone made the owner extremely happy, not to mention the time savings.

C-DOT has since added concrete maturity to its construction specifications under section 641. The 2009 revision can be found at http://www.dot.state.co.us/DesignSupport/Construction/Recently%20Issued%20Specs/2009-11-05/601641s.doc


TXDOT Concrete Maturity Specification

clock March 10, 2010 23:20 by author Michael Fox

 

TxDOT projects have long been users of intelliRock and concrete maturity technology. Hi-5 in Dallas is an excellent example (case study).

The Texas Pavement Design Guide states: "The maturity method, Tex-426-A, Estimating Concrete Strength by the Maturity Method, may be used to open the pavement to traffic at an earlier age than seven days with either Class P or Class HES concrete."

Tex-426-A is an excellent place for DOTs to start when considering a state maturity specification and is available online. The calibration curve adjustment provision when verifying the strength-maturity relationship is of particular interest. Contact Engius for more example specifications.


Baker beats the heat with intelliRock and saves CEMEX $130k

clock March 10, 2010 00:13 by author Michael Fox

Baker Concrete’s commitment to excellence and innovation brought the new CEMEX headquarters in on schedule, under-budget, and with LEED points.

The 325,000 square foot CEMEX headquarters is one of the largest green buildings in Houston. What made this possible? Use of a leaner mix design containing fly ash and a maturity program with intelliRock. This combination also saved money,kept the project on schedule, and earned LEED points for the environmentally-conscious owner.

“The CEMEX headquarters project should serve as the poster‐child for intelliRock because everything went exactly according to plan and we kept right on schedule.” – Aaron Smith, Senior Project Executive, Baker

Read the Baker/CEMEX case study!


Using intelliRock to Lower Material Costs

clock March 5, 2010 23:58 by author Michael Fox

Concrete maturity is usually used as a tool to determine early-age concrete strength.  However, the same information can be used for many other applications.  One example is lowering material cost!

Early-age strength information from intelliRock (concrete maturity sensors) accelerates construction schedules because contractors can get real-time concrete strength readings with the press of a button.  Armed with this information contractors know exactly when forms can be stripped, structures can be loaded, and when they can proceed with other construction activities.  But what happens when the concrete strengths reach targets earlier than necessary?  Opportunities arise! 

Rapid strength gain usually means high cement content.  In situations where strength gain is faster than necessary, there are opportunities to use ‘leaner’ mix designs.  These leaner mix designs contain less cement which translates to:

  • Lower material cost
  • Less paste (better durability, less shrinkage, etc)
  • Less carbon dioxide production
  • Opportunity to use recycled materials (fly ash/slag)
  • Lower in-place temperatures (less thermal cracking, DEF risk)

With calibration curves in-hand for alternate mix designs, contractors can identify alternate, lower-cost mix designs that are can still keep the job on schedule. (see related post below)

Note that to reduce material costs, contractors should start the job with several approved alternate mix designs, and favorable pricing on these mix designs prenegotiated with the concrete supplier.  It is very common for contractors to contractually protect themselves from price increases during the job by locking in the price of the concrete.  But, that often means that the cost per cubic yard is the same, even if they switch to a leaner mix.  Contractors should not only manage price risk during the bidding process, but they should also ensure that if lower cost concrete can be used on the job they will share in the cost savings.

Armed with intelliRock, maturity curves, alternate approved mix designs, and strategic concrete pricing could mean big savings on material with no slip in schedule.  What would saving several dollars on every CY of concrete mean to YOUR bottom line?  Grab a calculator and give your intelliRock rep a call!

Related Post: A little maturity math, a lot of insight!


Case Study: Scottrade Parking Garage - Concrete Strategies

clock February 20, 2010 01:31 by author Michael Fox
 

 

Clayco, Inc. and concrete sub Concrete Strategies, Inc. recently completed a 2 story parking garage for online brokerage firm Scottrade in St. Louis, Missouri. Information from intelliRock concrete maturity sensors was used to time critical workflow activities such as post tensioning.

 

Left: Scottrade Building HQ and garage site in St. Louis, MO.
Right: Post tension cables which were stressed in two stages, 1600 PSI and 3000 PSI

Concrete Strategies VP, Barclay Gebel explains “For crack controlling reasons we stressed the PT cables in two stages. The first stage was when the concrete achieved 1600 psi and the second stage was 3000 psi. We use intelliRock to determine when to do the stressing.”

Project engineer Curt Costello continues, ”We were able to determine when different crews would come in to start stripping forms and preparing the PT cables for stressing. Once the strengths were met, we were able to stress the cables without losing much time. This was because we were able to anticipate concrete strengths based on information from intelliRock.”

The graph above is an example of the information available to Concrete Strategies in real-time at the jobsite. intelliRock sensors evaluated the concrete’s maturity every 60 seconds. The maturity reading could be correlated to a concrete strength using a calibration curve for the mix design. This gave Concrete Strategies up-to-the-minute concrete strength values.

*******

Clayco, Inc. is one of the nation's largest, privately owned real estate, architecture and engineering, design/build and construction firms. Read more about Clayco at www.claycorp.com.

Concrete Strategies is a leading edge, full service, design/build and general contracting firm specializing in all forms of concrete and structural steel construction. The firm operates nationally and has an unparalleled track record in architectural site cast concrete, structural concrete, flatwork and all types of self-perform construction related to commercial projects. For more information see their website at www.concretestrategies.com


A Little Maturity Math, a Lot of Insight!

clock February 19, 2010 01:53 by author Michael Fox

If you’re ever wondering what a maturity calibration curve (graph shows strength vs maturity in °C-Hrs) could tell you about the time needed to reach a target strength, there is a simple calculation can give you enough information to at least see what’s feasible.

Maturity, using the Nurse-Saul method, is given in units of °C-Hours.   The calculation is simply “Time x Temperature” with the units of time being hours, and units of temperature in °C.  Assuming the common datum temperature of 0 °C, the math gets that simple:  Maturity = Time x Temperature.  Just be sure you get the units right.

Let’s assume you need 4,000 PSI and your calibration curve says the maturity needed for 4,000 PSI is 3,500 °C-Hrs.  How long is that?  A convenient first approximation is to see how long 3,500 °C-Hrs is at a comfortable 23 °C (73 °F) temperature.  Maturity/Temperature  = time, 3500 °C-hrs/23 °C = 152 hours, which is a little over 6 days.  If your goal is 4,000 PSI in 7 days and it’s warm outside, then you’re probably fine with that mix design.  If you need the 4,000 PSI in 3 days, then what do you need to do to get there?  You need higher temperatures!  How high?  Temp = Maturity/Time,  Temp = 3,500 °C-Hrs/(3 days* 24hrs/day) = 49 °C (104 °F).  Is it reasonable for the concrete to have an average curing temperature of at least 49 °C?   Mass concrete in Florida during July – you’re just fine.  A thin elevated deck during January in Chicago – you’ll either have to supply supplementary heat or use a “hotter” mix.

This simple calculation is especially insightful when considering leaner, lower cost mix designs.  Take the example where you need to achieve 3,000 PSI in 2 days and your maturity data says you are achieving 5,000 PSI in 2 days using your expensive high-early mix.  Would a standard lower-cost mix design still get you there?  Grab the calibration curve for the leaner mix, see what maturity is necessary, divide maturity by 48 hours and see what average curing temperature you need (remember, that’s the temperature of the concrete, not the ambient temperature).  Compare the calculated temperature to the temperatures profile you’re currently getting with the high-early mix. Considering that the leaner mix will run somewhat cooler, is it likely that the average 48 hour concrete temperature will be at or above what the maturity calculation said?  This simple calculation can at least tell you yes, no or maybe.  For a 60 second effort, that’s a lot of insight.


AASHTO T 325

clock February 18, 2010 02:51 by author Michael Fox

The current AASHTO maturity specification is designated T 325-04(2008) “Standard Method of Test for Estimating the Strength of Concrete in Transportation Construction by Maturity Tests."


This specification, as most, is built around ASTM C 1074 and is intended to be used for estimating the strength of concrete in pavements as well as structures.  Specific uses are the timing of:
•     Opening to traffic
•    Form Removal
•    Post Tensioning
•    Termination of curing procedures
•    Destructive methods of evaluating concrete strength

Absent in most other specifications, T 325 does recommend the minimum number of temperature/maturity sensors to be used on a concrete placement.
•    Slabs, beams, and abutment walls:  5 per 100 cubic meters
•    Small columns:  1
•    Large columns:  2
•    Pavements and overlays: 2 per 1000 sq meters

•    Pavement repairs: 2 per 750 cu meters or one per repair

The AASHTO specification also addresses situations where not  every lot of concrete is tested.

One interesting recommendation by SHRP researchers is the usage of the Arrhenius function as opposed to Nurse-Saul.  I’ll skip the Arrhenius versus Nurse-Saul soapbox speech for now, but will say that if Arrhenius models are used one should perform a rigorous calibration procedure at multiple temperatures, and be sure that the mix and materials are extremely consistent.  As with any maturity technique, validate the mix often and follow the recommendations of the engineer of record on each jobsite.


Copies of the specification are available for purchase at several sites online including:
http://global.ihs.com and http://www.techstreet.com


Concrete Maturity Specification - ASTM C 1074

clock February 15, 2010 22:36 by author Michael Fox

ASTM C 1074 "Standard Practice for Estimating Concrete Strength by the Maturity Method" is the basis for virtually all concrete maturity specifications in the U.S.  The document provides procedures for estimating concrete strength using a maturity index as either a “time-temperature factor” or “equivalent age.”   The resulting strength information can be used to allow the start of construction activities such as:


1.    Removal of formwork
2.    Post-tensioning
3.    Cold weather protection termination
4.    Opening roadways to traffic


When using maturity on workflow-related activities maturity is replacing or enhancing information typically given by field-cured cylinders.  It is important to realize that maturity does not replace all usage of concrete test specimens (cylinders or beams).  The maturity method is based on information from cylinders or beams and destructive testing of specimens must continue for quality control purposes, to ensure consistency of the concrete mix.

The overall procedure is comprised of the following steps:

CALIBRATION
1.     Select a concrete mix design
2.    Prepare test specimens (beams, cylinders, cubes, etc).   At least qty 15.
3.    Embed a maturity sensor in the center of two test specimens.
4.    Cure the specimens.
5.    Perform breaks, typically at 1, 3, 7, 14, and 28 days and read the specimen’s maturity from the sensors in the instrumented specimens.
6.    Compile a strength vs maturity calibration curve from t he data.

ESTIMATING IN-PLACE STRENGTH
1.     Embed a maturity sensor either before, or immediately after concrete placement.
2.    Begin logging temperature and maturity information
3.    As the concrete cures, monitor the maturity reading until the maturity index indicates that the target strength is attained.  The target strength is typically 75% or 100% of the specified strength.
4.    Convert the maturity reading to compressive or flexural strength as needed.
5.    Validate the delivered mix to be sure the delivered concrete is consistent with the expected mix design.  There are multiple ways to accomplish this step, but you do NOT need to wait on test specimens to reach target strength.
6.    If the mix is validated, the strength reading based on the maturity index can be used for timing construction operations.

For more information, review the current version of ASTM C 1074.  You can purchase a copy online at: http://www.astm.org/Standards/C1074.htm


Calendar

<<  February 2012  >>
MoTuWeThFrSaSu
303112345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728291234
567891011

View posts in large calendar

Sign in