
The current AASHTO maturity specification is designated T 325-04(2008) “Standard Method of Test for Estimating the Strength of Concrete in Transportation Construction by Maturity Tests."
This specification, as most, is built around ASTM C 1074 and is intended to be used for estimating the strength of concrete in pavements as well as structures. Specific uses are the timing of:
• Opening to traffic
• Form Removal
• Post Tensioning
• Termination of curing procedures
• Destructive methods of evaluating concrete strength
Absent in most other specifications, T 325 does recommend the minimum number of temperature/maturity sensors to be used on a concrete placement.
• Slabs, beams, and abutment walls: 5 per 100 cubic meters
• Small columns: 1
• Large columns: 2
• Pavements and overlays: 2 per 1000 sq meters
• Pavement repairs: 2 per 750 cu meters or one per repair
The AASHTO specification also addresses situations where not every lot of concrete is tested.
One interesting recommendation by SHRP researchers is the usage of the Arrhenius function as opposed to Nurse-Saul. I’ll skip the Arrhenius versus Nurse-Saul soapbox speech for now, but will say that if Arrhenius models are used one should perform a rigorous calibration procedure at multiple temperatures, and be sure that the mix and materials are extremely consistent. As with any maturity technique, validate the mix often and follow the recommendations of the engineer of record on each jobsite.
Copies of the specification are available for purchase at several sites online including:
http://global.ihs.com and http://www.techstreet.com

ASTM C 1074 "Standard Practice for Estimating Concrete Strength by the Maturity Method" is the basis for virtually all concrete maturity specifications in the U.S. The document provides procedures for estimating concrete strength using a maturity index as either a “time-temperature factor” or “equivalent age.” The resulting strength information can be used to allow the start of construction activities such as:
1. Removal of formwork
2. Post-tensioning
3. Cold weather protection termination
4. Opening roadways to traffic
When using maturity on workflow-related activities maturity is replacing or enhancing information typically given by field-cured cylinders. It is important to realize that maturity does not replace all usage of concrete test specimens (cylinders or beams). The maturity method is based on information from cylinders or beams and destructive testing of specimens must continue for quality control purposes, to ensure consistency of the concrete mix.
The overall procedure is comprised of the following steps:
CALIBRATION
1. Select a concrete mix design
2. Prepare test specimens (beams, cylinders, cubes, etc). At least qty 15.
3. Embed a maturity sensor in the center of two test specimens.
4. Cure the specimens.
5. Perform breaks, typically at 1, 3, 7, 14, and 28 days and read the specimen’s maturity from the sensors in the instrumented specimens.
6. Compile a strength vs maturity calibration curve from t he data.
ESTIMATING IN-PLACE STRENGTH
1. Embed a maturity sensor either before, or immediately after concrete placement.
2. Begin logging temperature and maturity information
3. As the concrete cures, monitor the maturity reading until the maturity index indicates that the target strength is attained. The target strength is typically 75% or 100% of the specified strength.
4. Convert the maturity reading to compressive or flexural strength as needed.
5. Validate the delivered mix to be sure the delivered concrete is consistent with the expected mix design. There are multiple ways to accomplish this step, but you do NOT need to wait on test specimens to reach target strength.
6. If the mix is validated, the strength reading based on the maturity index can be used for timing construction operations.
For more information, review the current version of ASTM C 1074. You can purchase a copy online at: http://www.astm.org/Standards/C1074.htm