Engius intelliRock Concrete Maturity Blog

Concrete Maturity used for Shotcrete? You bet!

clock March 31, 2010 23:12 by author Michael Fox

Contractors in Colorado have been using intelliRock concrete maturity loggers in shotcrete for several years. In one instance in 2008, winter arrived and the contractor was concerned about construction speed and heating costs. The contractor developed a maturity calibration curve then place intelliRock maturity loggers along the retaining wall being built. Once the concrete was placed the wall was covered and the heaters were turned on.

In general, a typical Colorado winter spec requires the contractor to maintain the placement above 50 F for 7 days or until there's proof that the placement has achieved 75% of the required concrete strength. In this case, the contractor used intelliRock to determine that the placement achieved 75% strength well in advance of the turn-time on previous walls - and during this one it was snowing! The savings on the heating costs alone made the owner extremely happy, not to mention the time savings.

C-DOT has since added concrete maturity to its construction specifications under section 641. The 2009 revision can be found at http://www.dot.state.co.us/DesignSupport/Construction/Recently%20Issued%20Specs/2009-11-05/601641s.doc


TXDOT Concrete Maturity Specification

clock March 10, 2010 23:20 by author Michael Fox

 

TxDOT projects have long been users of intelliRock and concrete maturity technology. Hi-5 in Dallas is an excellent example (case study).

The Texas Pavement Design Guide states: "The maturity method, Tex-426-A, Estimating Concrete Strength by the Maturity Method, may be used to open the pavement to traffic at an earlier age than seven days with either Class P or Class HES concrete."

Tex-426-A is an excellent place for DOTs to start when considering a state maturity specification and is available online. The calibration curve adjustment provision when verifying the strength-maturity relationship is of particular interest. Contact Engius for more example specifications.


AASHTO T 325

clock February 18, 2010 02:51 by author Michael Fox

The current AASHTO maturity specification is designated T 325-04(2008) “Standard Method of Test for Estimating the Strength of Concrete in Transportation Construction by Maturity Tests."


This specification, as most, is built around ASTM C 1074 and is intended to be used for estimating the strength of concrete in pavements as well as structures.  Specific uses are the timing of:
•     Opening to traffic
•    Form Removal
•    Post Tensioning
•    Termination of curing procedures
•    Destructive methods of evaluating concrete strength

Absent in most other specifications, T 325 does recommend the minimum number of temperature/maturity sensors to be used on a concrete placement.
•    Slabs, beams, and abutment walls:  5 per 100 cubic meters
•    Small columns:  1
•    Large columns:  2
•    Pavements and overlays: 2 per 1000 sq meters

•    Pavement repairs: 2 per 750 cu meters or one per repair

The AASHTO specification also addresses situations where not  every lot of concrete is tested.

One interesting recommendation by SHRP researchers is the usage of the Arrhenius function as opposed to Nurse-Saul.  I’ll skip the Arrhenius versus Nurse-Saul soapbox speech for now, but will say that if Arrhenius models are used one should perform a rigorous calibration procedure at multiple temperatures, and be sure that the mix and materials are extremely consistent.  As with any maturity technique, validate the mix often and follow the recommendations of the engineer of record on each jobsite.


Copies of the specification are available for purchase at several sites online including:
http://global.ihs.com and http://www.techstreet.com


Concrete Maturity Specification - ASTM C 1074

clock February 15, 2010 22:36 by author Michael Fox

ASTM C 1074 "Standard Practice for Estimating Concrete Strength by the Maturity Method" is the basis for virtually all concrete maturity specifications in the U.S.  The document provides procedures for estimating concrete strength using a maturity index as either a “time-temperature factor” or “equivalent age.”   The resulting strength information can be used to allow the start of construction activities such as:


1.    Removal of formwork
2.    Post-tensioning
3.    Cold weather protection termination
4.    Opening roadways to traffic


When using maturity on workflow-related activities maturity is replacing or enhancing information typically given by field-cured cylinders.  It is important to realize that maturity does not replace all usage of concrete test specimens (cylinders or beams).  The maturity method is based on information from cylinders or beams and destructive testing of specimens must continue for quality control purposes, to ensure consistency of the concrete mix.

The overall procedure is comprised of the following steps:

CALIBRATION
1.     Select a concrete mix design
2.    Prepare test specimens (beams, cylinders, cubes, etc).   At least qty 15.
3.    Embed a maturity sensor in the center of two test specimens.
4.    Cure the specimens.
5.    Perform breaks, typically at 1, 3, 7, 14, and 28 days and read the specimen’s maturity from the sensors in the instrumented specimens.
6.    Compile a strength vs maturity calibration curve from t he data.

ESTIMATING IN-PLACE STRENGTH
1.     Embed a maturity sensor either before, or immediately after concrete placement.
2.    Begin logging temperature and maturity information
3.    As the concrete cures, monitor the maturity reading until the maturity index indicates that the target strength is attained.  The target strength is typically 75% or 100% of the specified strength.
4.    Convert the maturity reading to compressive or flexural strength as needed.
5.    Validate the delivered mix to be sure the delivered concrete is consistent with the expected mix design.  There are multiple ways to accomplish this step, but you do NOT need to wait on test specimens to reach target strength.
6.    If the mix is validated, the strength reading based on the maturity index can be used for timing construction operations.

For more information, review the current version of ASTM C 1074.  You can purchase a copy online at: http://www.astm.org/Standards/C1074.htm


Calendar

<<  February 2012  >>
MoTuWeThFrSaSu
303112345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728291234
567891011

View posts in large calendar

Sign in